Archive for the 'Political' Category

What did he do to deserve it?

Today, our president of the United States, was named the winner of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. I was surprised to find this bit of news waiting for me in my e-mail this morning, as a news alert from the New York Times. I knew that several people were not going to be happy with this development.

I didn’t expect such a public firestorm.

I arrived at my office to my boss complaining, with the words of the title of this post emanating from his office. I’ve heard similar sentiments from others who might or might not be like minded, namely Rush Limbaugh and Michael Steele (both of whom should try to run for President some day – it would be great for comedy).

One of my staffers greeted me with: “Did you see what your ‘boy’ did today?”

Unfortunately, that’s just it: President Barack Obama didn’t do anything, except espouse the belief that America (and thus the world) would be better off if it were to use its power for peaceful purposes rather than running rough-shod over the world the way the previous administration did. As such, it’s my opinion (which is worth roughly $0.02 today) that the President is eminently qualified as a Nobel laureate.

As I alluded to in a comment about a previous news article attributed to Rush Limbaugh: We turned that corner on November 4, 2008, in this country, and, my friends, we would be wise to not look back (except, of course, to help fix the mess that you see in the rearview mirror).

The race to replace Mel Martinez heats up…

Steve Schale, former (and quite successful I might add) head of the Florida for Obama campaign committee will endorse Kendrick Meek as Democratic candidate for US Senate in the upcoming 2010 race to replace retiring senator Mel Martinez. Schale will announce this in a press conference today.

This is great news, since most of the mainstream media buzz surrounding the race appears to focus solely on the single-term republican governor Charlie Crist versus Marco Rubio race as though those two are the only ones running.

With the race for healthcare reform stuck in the doldrums, and Bill Nelson on the fence about a public-run option, we need to help elect a candidate who embraces the liberal progressive agenda.

I think the race just got kicked up a notch with this hugely important endorsement.

Obama changes tactic on Iran…

… only he really didn’t.

And if he did, show me because I can’t see it.

From the Monday following the elections, to yesterday’s comments in his news conference, President Obama has railed against the vicious treatment protesters in Iran have received at the hands of the Basiji.

He has stopped short of calling the results of the elections illegitimate; however, is that really the place of our President? The last one to say something he wasn’t absolutely sure about ended up getting us involved in two wars, tanking our economy, and generally ransacking our international prestige in the process, so much so that Obama is still working hard to right the ship.

Barack Obama spoke initially in measured tones on the issue. Yesterday he was a bit more forceful in his rhetoric…

Perhaps that change in timbre is what is meant by a “change in tactic.”

But I still don’t see it.

Obama’s Speech – Jindal’s Rebuttal

I was quite impressed with President Obama’s speech to the Joint Session of Congress last night. While there was not much that was substantively new, I appreciated the fact that he got up there and stated what has been on pretty much everyone’s mind lately. And while he didn’t make light of the subject, I do think he brought just the right touch of levity to the situation: We are in tough economic times, and we will have some political haggling, but we do need to remember who sent us here and do the work they want us to do.

What most impressed me about the speech was the three-legged approach to fixing the country’s economic ills that Obama proposed: fixing the health care problems, fixing education, and fixing banking. These three items are absolutely critical if we want to flourish as a nation. How we do it is where we will probably see more political bickering. This being said, I do appreciate Obama’s sense that he will listen to parties on all sides of an issue and welcomes ideas from all around.

After watching the speech, I debated with myself whether to turn off the tube and think about how happy I am we have an administration in power that seems to be making good on its promise to bring more transparency to DC. However, I really wanted to see what the Republican party would say in its response.

Watching Bobby Jindal speak took me back to some of my high school debates, figuratively speaking, of course. Jindal’s ideas, some of which resonated with me, came up short because of the style of delivery he chose – as if Mr. Jindal was talking down to children. While Obama is a tough act to follow when speaking, I hardly expected such a tentative response.

Insofar as the content of Jindal’s speech was concerned, I was most disappointed with the continued scary rhetoric that all the Democratic party wants to do is enlarge the government, particularly as it pertains to healthcare. While I wholly welcome the increase in taxes for those who make more than $250,000 per year, it hardly seems likely that we can afford to increase the size of our government. In fact, I would suggest that Obama’s plan doesn’t increase the size of government as much as it right-sizes it, building a foundation from which we can prosper once again. Applying the right amount of oversight, so that we can clean up messes like we have now, and prevent them from happening in the future, with an appropriate mix of regulation, rather than the irrational exuberance that was the hallmark of the last administration.

I feel that we are getting back onto the right track.

I welcome your comments.

What is going on here???

I’m glad that one of the first things Obama did when he took office was to right the wrongs of the previous administration by signing executive orders stating the goals of a transparent administration guided by people who have no lobbying interests. Unfortunately, the second thing he did was to make an exception to this rule for messers Patterson and Lynn.

I am all for government transparency, and laud the efforts of this new administration; however, I do question the workability of these rules as we move forward.

The other things that Obama needs to work on are Geithner and Daschle. These gentlemen aren’t your run-of-the-mill citizens. They are smart people. Shouldn’t they have the money to hire accountants to make sure they aren’t cheating their once and future employer out out taxes?

I do my own taxes, and can appreciate one’s desire to do their own taxes, but come on – even my coworker officemate uses an accountant.

My thoughts on the debate…

I watched part of the debate between the Vice Presidential candidates, Sarah Palin (R) and Joseph Biden (D), last night.  I thought both performed rather well.  Joe Biden stayed away from any of the major gaffes for which he has become infamous, and Sarah Palin displayed a much more articulate side of her that had apparently been absent in her prior TV interviews.

Throughout the debate, I found myself annoyed that Biden kept attacking John McCain, rather than attacking Palin directly.  However, in retrospect, I believe he comported himself in the most appropriate way, since each direct attach on Palin would have likely scored points for her, rather than for him.  Not for the content of the attacks, but merely for the point that he would have been attacking a newcomer to the national political stage with which he himself has been familiar for decades.

I did, however, find Palin a bit condescending in her tone at times, and annoying to listen to.  And is it just me, or is she taking her acting lessons from Hillary Clinton?

Somewhere between Jacksonville and Orlando…

NPR’s Morning Edition is reporting today that John McCain stated at a rally in Jacksonville, Florida that “The fundamentals of the economy are strong,” but changed his tune when he was at a rally later that day in Orlando, Florida to “I know Americans are hurting.” The distance between these two cities, according to Google Maps, is 141 miles, or about a two-hour drive (probably a two-hour flight, too… maybe not, I don’t know if McCain sprung for a flight or travelled by bus.).

I’d like to know why he changed his tune. It could be that McCain has finally come to his senses that the current Executive has lead us down the wrong path, to a point where we now have investment banks – some of the largest in the world – failing, taking out insurance companies in their wake. It could be that McCain suddenly finds himself lamenting the binds in which the working class finds itself. However, I’m more inclined to believe that one of McCain’s advisors whispered to him, “Nice job John… you might want to change your message at the next stop…”

You see, the problem with the McCain-Palin ticket is that they don’t share any links with the working- or middle class voter, aside from Palin’s family (arguably) being from the middle class. McCain has been a staunch supporter of a market free of government intervention; Palin has been a staunch supporter of a “hands off” approach to Federal Government intervention in Alaska.

Barack Obama may not be an economist, but at the very least he knows that what we have now isn’t working – and he HAS known this for a long time.

It’s not something he just learned in his latest 141 mile trip, like McCain did.

Why Obama-Biden in ‘08?

Of course, if you read my blog (even with its late dearth of postings) you know that I am a social liberal, and there is absolutely no chance of my voting for the “McCain-?” ticket; but I belong to a demographic that is, by and large, supposedly solidly in McCain’s court: namely, white American males between the ages of 35-65. So I want to state exactly why I will be voting for the Obama-Biden ticket this November, and I want to try to sway your vote that way in the process.

First, and foremost, I say that there is actually substance to the argument that Barack Obama is inexperienced at executive leadership. He’s primarily been involved in interactive policy design, and has been a public servant pretty much his whole life (when he hasn’t been a student). When the Clintons, and, in the upcoming months, to a greater extent the McCains (and their followers) say “Obama lacks experience,” this is what they are talking about. Experience in executive function.

Like Barack, John McCain has served this country in the military, and in public service, to such an extent that he should automatically be granted the status “American Hero,” because he is. He spent a lot of time in a Viet Namese prison camp, gave up a chance to come home early as a POW (because he was a person of privilege due to his father’s rank), and came home to a life of politics to try to make absolutely sure we wouldn’t have to go through another war like he fought in.

The job of President of the United States is, without a doubt, perhaps the most unique job in the land. One does not apply to it – one is mostly swept in that direction by political drive. When one aspires to the job, and is pushed toward it, one is not interviewed by one, or two, or three people, but by the media who claim they have the “best interest” of legions of voters in mind. Voters who feel, and who voice those feelings at the polling place, that the person has the qualities it takes to lead this land of ours to greatness.

There is no doubt in my mind that Barack Obama and John McCain both could do a much better job than the incumbent in the position. No doubt whatsoever.

What sells me on Barack Obama, and what you might want to listen to, is, in fact, Barack Obama’s rhetoric, because the next President of these United States has, perhaps, the toughest time ahead in store for them.

We’re at war on two fronts, we have an economy that is tanking, the disparity between the richest half of the country and the poorest half is growing by leaps and bounds. We have a mortgage banking industry that has put itself in the unenviable position of potentially having to be bailed out by we taxpayers to the tune of billions, if not trillions, of dollars. Our health care system, while it takes generally good care of me, does not work for many of this country’s most vulnerable people – people we all depend on, day in and day out, who provide us with the inexpensive services that lubricate the wheels of commerce: hourly, waged workers who can only get 20-30 hours of work per week.

Put simply, we are headed in the wrong direction. The person in the White House needs to be able to rally us to make positive changes, because only with we, the middle class, on board to make those changes, will we be able to restore America to greatness.

John McCain has a very perfunctory way of dealing with those who don’t share his opinions. I’ve yet to see him get a crowd of people excited about the potential that exists here in America, and excitement about future possibilities is what we need.

In this great land of ours, we need to be lead to greatness. Not lead by fear and warmongering, but lead by the potential of positive outcomes.

Obama-Biden ‘08

Let the election season begin!

It looks to me that we will have a relatively close fight on our hands, between Obama and McCain. I just hope that the PUMA supporters can get over their issues and realize that we really do need the kind of change that Obama will bring to the White House.

Thoughts?

The New Voting Machines

Back when I was… 10 or 11, I think… (It would have been around 1980), my folks took me to the Dade County Youth Fair.  One of my highlights at the fair was seeing the “new” punch-card voting machines they had there.  These “new” punch-card voting machines were replacing the booths into which one would walk, throw the lever to close the curtain, and then pull the toggle to enter your choice on your ballot.

They were the ill-fated punch-card machines that caused the debacle 20 years later when we had Mr. Hanging Chad causing Al Gore to lose the presidency, thus setting our country on a one-way trip to hell, from which we can hopefully recover with the help of the next leader.

Anyhow, this year, my wife and I got a chance to see the new optical scan ballot voting machines.

It looks simple.

One will take a paper ballot, and a #2 pencil, and walk to a booth at which the voter will be able to make their selection.  The voter will then walk to the scan machine and insert according to the instructions.  The screen will then tell the voter whether or not they have over– or undervoted, and give the voter an opportunity to kick back the ballot to rework it.

If the voter chooses to cast their ballot, it is accepted into the secure cabinet underneath the scanner.  If the voter chooses to reject their ballot to correct it, the machine will spit it out and the voter can rework it to go through the whole song and dance again.

While it doesn’t give me a receipt, at least I know that my paper will be kept on hand for review if necessary.