The necessary speech for the ideal president

Latinoamericanos/as I feel proud, and is an historical privilege for me, to be able to direct me to you from my condition of president of the United States of North America. In my route by different countries from the region, I could verify that there is to change our foreign policy for Latin America and until the way to make policy of the United States. The policy based on the economic relation no longer is sufficient, we must go to the fight of the ideas, because in the ideological land, is where we are losing the war, even within our own country.

The left, when it has arrived at the power, the economic results of their governments have been disastrous and in spite of it and of the landslide of the socialist field it has maintained his speech and its ideological perspective that embriaga to the towns, but now that has reinforced with a strange alliance between the Islamic fundamentalists and neon dictatorships Populists of Latin America, with a incalculable economic potential.

All this, while the irrational antiamericanismo grows. Our culture of respect to the human rights is being used, to undermine and to debilitate our fight against the terrorism. The main target of the great American and world-wide liberal press is not to create brings back to consciousness on the enormous danger that blossoming on our nation and mainly the West. Quite the opposite, which is wanted to present/display as a danger is our effort to confront the threat of the terrorism We must use our speech as it arms and it preaches of the good and the good will of the United States, if we want to prevail like nation.

During my period of mandate the attention has been questioned that the United States has offered Latin America, but would be necessary to ask itself, what have offered the Latin American towns him to the United States? An aggressive policy, inspired by some governors and the retrograde left, in the style of the times of the cold war. Not only during my government, but during decades, our country has provided him numerous bottoms to governments and Latin American institutions, where they have been going to stop those bottoms? It is certain, that by our model of government, I eat president I cannot even do what other governors do of the region and very turns that them into Populists, distributing the resources of his countries as presells policy, having the human material to distribute it by the different countries without consulting his will, as is the case of the Cuban professionals, who in the end end up fleeing towards the United States.

More generosity for Latin America is requested and I am certainly the American town would have that will, but They have not seen its mobilizations and manifestations antiamericanista? With that attitude towards the United States, they think that they are going to convince the North American population and to its representatives in the congress and the Senate to manage to turn into citizens all the Latin Americans that our country or our volunteers and professionals enter they would have the will to sacrifice itself by a town despises that them?

When the United States has needed the support of the Latin American governments to endorse their position in front of violating countries of the human rights like Cuba, many have abstained and when our national security has been attacked by terrorists, like tragic the 11 of September, just a few countries were shared in common and they sent troops to fight to the terrorists in its own madriguera. Then, of what solidarity speaks and what compassion speak for Latin America. The person in charge of the great tragedy and Latin American poverty is not the United States, but its governments and institutions and is to them those who they must ask account to them his towns and all to put themselves to work, like it has made this great town North American, that for that reason has obtained its great prosperity.

Many criticize our migratory policy, nevertheless our town has the possibility of entering and of leaving the country with total freedom and will. There is country that have offered more opportunities them and no protection to the illegal immigrants who we, and have turned that them into their own citizens Could the Latin American governments say the same of their deal with the illegal immigrants who arrive at their respective countries? Nevertheless, I have not seen the activitas of human rights interested in this problem, that he constitutes the worse epidemic than he faces the today world. And they know why? Because their governments have not obtained economic emprendimientos that make possible a suitable social policy, forcing its towns to risk it everything to go away to our country, that if it offers an economic stability him, that reaches them and to send in the form of remittances to its relatives who left back.

This it is a problem to which he wanted to refer to me.  The remittances are the flight of bigger net worth of this nation. It is necessary to be thinking about some economic solution to resist that flight of capital, that to medium or long term is going to harm the North American economy. Immigration although is a problem for the United States, is a responsibility of the governments of the region and would be very healthful to work together in programs of parallel development, where the remittances play a role protagónico as source of financing and investment in their respective countries and do not only go away to the sector of consumption and services as it is happening until now.

Today also I want to deal with the subject the famous wall that rises in the border with Mexico, that some have had the mediocrity to compare it with the wall of Berlin. Those ilusos seem not to remember that the wall of Berlin was to prevent the exit of the Germans towards the free world. We constructed a wall to avoid the uncontrolled entrance to our country, that puts in risk our national security and that is political international, where they let enter the immigrants freely, even in own Latin America? If outside thus, already in Cuba and Haiti they would not be citizen, without counting other countries with stops you indicate migratory.

The defenders of the illegal immigration, that many of them obtain and receive bottoms of the own United States allege that the illegal immigrants (undocumented) are not criminal, but is a crime as it happens in any of the world and try to give a semantic game him to the word from his liberal translation of the English to confuse, since they have done of I finish illegal by undocumented person, to smooth out the connotation of the word. In addition, a border by which crosses more than 700 000 thousand people to the year, nobody can assure that is not the departure point of the strategy of infiltration from the terrorists to our country.

It is certain that illegal immigration is a real problem in our nation and is necessary to find him necessary and perishable the solution. We must start off to determine who already are in the country, we will realize a census and a registry of all the illegal immigrants. From the victory of the determined term, all person who detects itself illegal in the country, will be made responsible deportee and with the expenses of the deportation. We will be promoting a summit with the governors of the main emitting countries of illegal immigrants for of joint form developing strategies and sharing responsibilities.

I am in favor of a migratory reform that responds to the interests of our country and to a logic in its implementation, that of possibility of legal work to all the illegal immigrants who at the moment are here per indefinite time, that them of permanent residence to the minors of 21 years, mainly to that they are studying and that him of a legal solution to which they have committed some crime, without in this way avoids the familiar separation.

A migratory reform is inadequate that of direct access to the residence and citizenship because in this way a right of legal entrance to a limitless number of immigrants is granted that would make colapsar our social and economic infrastructure and that would violate the right of which they abroad realized his legal proceedings in our embassies, and patiently wait for its visas, that they were already surpassed by which of illegal form they entered the country.

In the case of Cuba, it has been an error strategic to maintain an agreement migratory that it debilitates the social and political pressure of the Cuban town against his government. It is necessary to suspend the migratory agreement and whichever laws favor the emigration as valve of escape for the Cuban regime. The United States does not accept the blackmail of the Cuban dictatorship with their threat to cause a massive exodus. Any action in that sense will consider a declaration of war and will entail to a surgical reaction against the governing elite and the displaced ones will be given to the High Commissioner for the Refugees of United Nations.

Today I want to also talk about to a very controversial subject, the decision to attack the government of Iraq. Many people, of excellent importance have even accepted that the attack had to the presumed chemical arms that Sadan Housein owned and that really did not exist. To accept that our attack to Iraq only had by its possession of chemical arms and in addition to accept that it did not have them is a superficiality. It is necessary to consider the complexity of the topography of that country, where still fugitive people and sites exist where insurgents hide who have not been able to locate, who can assure to me that camouflaged chemical arms in Iraq do not exist

In addition, the government of Iraq defied the resolutions of the Security Council of the UN on biological weapons, he expelled his inspectors and he provided to support and sustenance to the terrorists who immolated themselves in operations against North American objectives or of our allies. Our enemies criticize because they include/understand the effectiveness of our strategy to attack the terrorists in his own territories, they to us would prefer we left that them in capacity to attack to us directly since they did the 11 of September when the Twin Towers and the Pentagon and killed more than three thousand North Americans.

We cannot stop recognizing that in the war of Iraq errors have been committed, we have been involved in an asymmetric and irregular war and not to retire at the precise moment. Use has not been made either of a technological supremacy that hits our enemies and that must be our main strategy as of these moments. The resolution or mediation in that conflict is a responsibility of the United Nations and Arab Liga, but as they are the things we must look for urgent a form different to maintain our presence in Iraq without putting under our troops from situations of high risk.

The United States as nation must make prevail their high technological development. The case of the kidnapped ones in Iraq, without having implanted microChips and the impossibility to make enter the signal of Radio and martí Television Cuba are a great technological ridiculous situation for our country like the first world-wide power.

As far as the crossed energetics. The ethanol or biocombustible was a proposal of the leftist movements when petroleum was the unique alternative like power plant for the developed countries. Today when the control of petroleum is into the hands of the most hostile countries the United States, for the left movement already the problem does not have the ecological impact that said to have

The United States must prevail, and not by a crazy and hegemonista eagerness, but for being the country that has the force able to stop the advance of all those intentions to make disappear our culture and identity like civilization. We must preserve our interests like nation, instilling to the great mass of immigrants the love to the American nation. Serious fatal for the United States that the immigrants who enter our great nation not welcome it like hers, but they arrive with the ballast of the universal antiamericanismo, because long term our society would be mined on the inside with a change in the demographic interrelation.

The United States to maintain their leadership world-wide will continue impelling their technological development. In the short term it will reduce his dependancy of petroleum and will turn the ethanol like his main power plant, for which the reconversion of all our industries for the new type of fuel will be political of state, that besides having a great economic importance and for the environment, also it is an indispensable political strategy. 

 The partisan opposition cannot become a strategic alliance against the United States. The partisan opposition cannot respond to the interests of our enemies, because beyond our political position, is North American and has the moral and historical responsibility of guarding by the interests of our great nation, over all the things.

That the alive North America,
That they reign by always and for always the United States.
Good night.